6 comments on
"Pathways (2006)" |
|
| Nathan |
| "Pathways 2000" |
Fri June 29, 2012 at 1:20 pm
|
This is supposed to be Pathways from 2000. What's up with that? |
|
Ryan |
| "@Lucas" |
Sun March 4, 2012 at 12:43 am
|
Thank you! I was always a bit disappointed in the reception this one received. |
|
| Lucas |
| "Dark science fiction indeed!" |
Thu March 1, 2012 at 10:07 am
|
This one is great! There's so much detail, and everytime I look at it I discover new things. Like Amaryllis said before, it too reminds me of dark hard science fiction. Beautiful! |
|
Ryan |
| "@Amaryllis" |
Tue June 21, 2011 at 3:14 pm
|
I agree with you. I was a bit disappointed that folks didn't seem to enjoy this one. |
|
| Amaryllis |
| "'Pathways' underappreciated" |
Tue June 21, 2011 at 2:48 pm
|
I think that this one rewards you for taking the time to REALLY look at it. It has depth. I'm not sure how it would work on my desktop (although if I had a triple screen I think it would be amazing), but it's a geat piece of digital art, and resonates with the kind of dark high-on-the-tech SF I like to read. |
|
| aaron |
| "I like" |
November 15, 2006
|
I really like this. So much this could represent. |
|
>>
){kind=link}
